tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1378420656556921390.post3312195092941557196..comments2024-01-04T21:09:17.661-08:00Comments on Oda Nobunaga-The warlord who changed Japan!: Nagashino/Shincho Ko-kiotsukehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02860648092920714383noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1378420656556921390.post-85046864540556134992010-04-15T09:11:46.063-07:002010-04-15T09:11:46.063-07:00Again, this is from Ota Gyuichi's Shincho Ko-k...Again, this is from Ota Gyuichi's Shincho Ko-ki. There was nothing written on Oda/Tokugawa dead. Just the Takeda. The numbers on both armies were too large. Gyuichi noted that the Oda/Tokugawa was around 30,000 or more and the Takeda 15,000. That is too high from today's standards. <br /><br />Remember Okehazama? Gyuichi noted down 45,000. Again, too large. Gyuichi was right on the guns 1,000, but army numbers wrong.otsukehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02860648092920714383noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1378420656556921390.post-52182245027649308052010-04-15T08:40:35.890-07:002010-04-15T08:40:35.890-07:00The 10,000 dead meaning from the Takeda? Was it i...The 10,000 dead meaning from the Takeda? Was it in the Varley article that talks about the actually number of soldiers on each side being roughly half what is often written? Meaning that rather than a total of 15,000 Takeda soldiers involved in the invasion, it was closer to maybe 7 to 8,000? I assume if that is the case than the total numbers of dead would be not more than 5,000. Which if true would still be horrendous, 4 or 5,000 dead out of maybe 8,000 Takeda soldiers.owenandbenjaminhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09474307542498791351noreply@blogger.com